Novaseeker In any case, exactly what Manta is arguing is civil penalties to make certain that if a female has intercourse with a guy plus it works out he lied about their age or status that is financial has got to spend a civil fine of 10k, because her “dignity” ended up being damaged.
Remember, that’s her maximum….at minimum for the time being. It can be that not all woman’s dignity checks in at $10,000, some might simply be $5,000 or also less. Quantifying this would be interesting, what’s the system? Is there such things ad micro dignities which are damaged by micro aggressions? Enquiring minds wish to know.
Absolutely there must be general public hearings on this, the more general general public the higher. CSPAN 3 without a doubt. Or at the least a legislation skool moot court might be utilized to explore just how to monetize any offered woman’s “dignity” to at the least an approximation that is first order of magnitude.
Or the complete “dignity” problem could possibly be defined at the start in the regards to provider (TOS) for on line matchmaking apps. Better still, some man that is enterprising jot down their own TOS having a variation regarding the typical “By clicking on this you accept the TOS in total” boilerplate language, and can include that in their online profile. Could hijinks that are legal? We dunno.
Exactly what if…. Some player’s TOS vs. A gold digger’s civil problem, get the popcorn…